Re: Rolling in sidebar, other mutt-ng type bits?
- To: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Rolling in sidebar, other mutt-ng type bits?
- From: Kyle Wheeler <kyle-mutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 21:34:58 -0500
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=memoryhole.net; h=date :from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to; s=default; bh=7CahBuLLCAO/oBAbXi97AAbpX4U=; b=iuY7 JIE9yisrav2z5kkodAgzZfCDdttANHeIMVnkMg3j2SF5T+x+TvpbnZXd8mZE2RtX DT9MpgDofgaHxDu2dqUXWI/D+p2AAI9uyiOSbDpxx8a7QQUfErgP3minITlnp/Rx 9zm+kLGfVjq0yQxBoACfvd2RtiPjnGRJohyI6BE=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=memoryhole.net; b=LslPqGEjhCotWmGN4COkb9NFShIHMfm7o7PqibkUYryTuKHOtnDGXkHQIGnsnia6JK/B6emMv4rMOgme3AyHiLAW2vfxw4bCUUa0a+DI5FIAWtMk1IjadoHs5pRKT3e5Zj3Q7wsr5tLJWVOAIgf3PlZB54VihOSxpIvWFm0w55o=; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:OpenPGP:User-Agent;
- In-reply-to: <20081023230850.GL31898@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-post: <mailto:mutt-users@mutt.org>
- List-unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users"
- Mail-followup-to: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- Openpgp: id=CA8E235E; url=http://www.memoryhole.net/~kyle/kyle-pgp.asc; preference=signencrypt
- References: <20081023212324.GI31898@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081023225128.GA96557@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081023230850.GL31898@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-10-20)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, October 23 at 04:08 PM, quoth Robin Lee Powell:
> mutt-ng had a sidebar feature; I have no idea if that's the same
> code as the one at
> http://www.lunar-linux.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=44
> , which is what I was comparing to.
>
> Is mutt-ng's sidebar the same as that one?
I believe so, yes; otherwise, I think Rocco would have brought the
sidebar over.
> "man muttrc" doesn't explain why it's not on by default; can I get a
> pointer to that?
I don't know *authoritatively*, but I believe there are two answers:
the first being backwards compatibility (i.e. that by default, mutt
should behave as it always has, not suddenly start sticking files
somewhere; that would be a privacy breach waiting to happen), and
second being that mutt's default mode of operation is not remote
mailbox browsing (though that's what many people primarily use it
for), but rather local mbox or Maildir browsing. Mutt has so many
config options, the defaults have to be geared to a particular use
case. In this case, mutt's default use-case is fetching mail out of
/var/spool/mail/$user and depositing it into some sort of ~/mail mbox.
Header caching may not be much of a win, and message caching
*certainly* isn't useful in that situation.
> Thank you for clearing things up for me! Sorry to have failed to
> find for what are obviously FAQs.
NP - sometimes it's worth writing a long explanation just to get it
into the archive for other people (and google) to find.
~Kyle
- --
You can get more with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind
word alone.
-- Al Capone
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Thank you for using encryption!
iEYEARECAAYFAkkBNFIACgkQBkIOoMqOI173AwCgyv7bbq6NgBfoSzjA0xzQBAE9
be4AnR3+16t9BuyeKV0TS7hd60tt2EkP
=v7Ee
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----