Re: set up trash for deleted messages
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 07:34:24AM +0100, Francis Moreau wrote:
> however if mutt considers to implement a very low quality trash, what does
> that mean ?
>
> 1/ Mutt developpers are lazy ;)
> 2/ There are so few people needing a trash by default that it
> really doesn't worth to implement a trash
> 3/ Mutt folks consider that having a trash is a bad idea and
> they don't want to push people in using it.
I think a combination of 2+3. But I would really like to see cd's trash
folder patch integrated into mutt. I think there are enough reasons that
this approach is better than the macro approach, and there are enough
people who like to have a "trash" folder, that it makes sense to do
this.
w