Re: Whose bug is this: Mutt or Claws?
- To: The Mutt <mutt-users@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Whose bug is this: Mutt or Claws?
- From: Kyle Wheeler <kyle-mutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:54:51 -0600
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=memoryhole.net; h=date: from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type: in-reply-to; q=dns/txt; s=default; bh=I98bBexqiUjo0qNO3VlWWhvIyk 4=; b=eVaTeOD2kN4MNMz7+l0Yj+dP4oXg/20/R+CCkMyskfCJfC3ZkU5dGMI7LH alVy2fsnD9nyPa5abkvkrhyp2cY6zIWUj34aB7szJRYTDnv4EbSq76J5NPiHpnOa 98BFz0bZ4ROYTPlczi1qOyKhorToKyEjNKdQCHM/1MVl6z6C8=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=memoryhole.net; b=FA+sRFigf2zBhA+giNY9J8bj5u+qa/Si2GbKgIcSVxQfOduvor5iokRy2luCs0XqEfVhZOhjANBbg74cLJ4liKjsxSZu478yqp8+900rbNnZAG4W9pCUaYnaF0trrmS6XmEQodpbLB352bMGb4l/VeYitHW0NANh0QM+FKGhjX0=; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent;
- In-reply-to: <20080125082700.GC5969@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-post: <mailto:mutt-users@mutt.org>
- List-unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users"
- Mail-followup-to: The Mutt <mutt-users@xxxxxxxx>
- References: <20080125082700.GC5969@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-01-14)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, January 25 at 09:27 AM, quoth Dan H.:
> - Is it legal for Claws, according to the MH spec, to put
> .mh_sequences in places that don't contain actual messages?
Yes, it's technically "legal". By doing so, Claws is defining those
folders as MH mailboxes, but that's generally harmless.
> - Should mutt show subdirectories of directories that contain a
> .mh_sequences file?
Put another way, can MH mailboxes legally contain subfolders?
According to this: http://docs.python.org/lib/mailbox-mh.html, yes,
indeed they can, so it's a mutt bug.
The next question to ask, before filing a bug, is: in mutt's browser,
how should it display this information to the user? (Think of it in
terms of "minimally invasive to the existing way of displaying things"
not in terms of "if I was writing a mail browser from scratch, I'd
make it look like Claws", because that will be more likely to get your
bug addressed).
I suggest double-listing in the parent directory, e.g. when browsing a
parent directory (note the use of the slash):
Folder1
Folder2
Folder2/
Folder3
Folder4/
While you're at it, mutt has this same problem in imap. :)
~Kyle
- --
Science is what we can tell a computer. Art is everything else.
-- Knuth
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Thank you for using encryption!
iD4DBQFHmfg7BkIOoMqOI14RAi7jAJ0aFDKNBUZkiv/4bEN7BEpEMIdH1wCXdQJw
ttyfxTR+slo5U4l0fFp1KA==
=eC6/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----