Re: list reply to mailing list (without Reply-To munging)
- To: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: list reply to mailing list (without Reply-To munging)
- From: Kyle Wheeler <kyle-mutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:22:40 -0600
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/
- Dkim-signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=memoryhole.net; h=received:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; q=dns/txt; s=default; bh=kRlrNLgQtziJeoBf/9oIVK3zK1o=; b=IV6wyUklM0jZznXxfQZtDPl56IpQ5Bg6A9R5fz5VFZJf6cUand6GQ3EiaXpozna5KKwWSH4fETcDJLIR0SUeFKpnVtX9LtxECsG541h0iR0iOLSRZfmTgEg1HSSmy3uAi0eYBwxVDz+tdoTRCHfd7sjG+HUex2FdmchIMuMJjLE=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=memoryhole.net; b=Nfo7zVgJQ7Sl7NxpW5q7QOxt556rAv3N+p7eIf4aBK9j8uASK0mVTbZF5+HJDuXntzZzboCYbGi+XjaxvD8xVbdV4DAEZrdBSymZkCDNtoZ6kDUkz3mKSjz/P8mOqzX/LAcSvFbpb3FsrG6pjCoRAwSYRcGIcY8cOtWw7PyT6VI=; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent;
- In-reply-to: <20070814201231.GA4678@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-post: <mailto:mutt-users@mutt.org>
- List-unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users"
- Mail-followup-to: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- References: <20060131212718.GA19250@masterpost> <20060131231447.GA5218@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060203130007.GA10765@masterpost> <20070814201231.GA4678@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-07-25)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, August 14 at 10:12 PM, quoth Hein Zelle:
> for those of us with retarded finger-memory that can't seem to get
> used to using "L" for list-reply, is it possible to make this an
> automatic action?
Of course!
> I've seen people configuring it with a folder hook and ~l, but I
> tend to read my email while still in the inbox. I thought about
> using a send-hook instead, but that's probably too late.
Using ~l patterns in message-hooks is what I use; that way the
rebinding happens as I view the message. If I reply to things from
index view, it doesn't help, but I don't generally reply to messages
without viewing them first, so this isn't a significant annoyance.
Here's what I use:
message-hook . 'bind pager l list-reply; bind pager r reply'
message-hook ~l 'bind pager l reply; bind pager r list-reply'
> Is it possible to make 'r' behave like 'L' for subscribed lists that
> don't set the Reply-To header to the list address, or perhaps to make mutt
> ask if I want to reply to the list?
Not (that I've found) while looking at the message from the index. But
the hooks I use are quite acceptable to me. Maybe that'll be
sufficient for you too?
~Kyle
- --
Carpe per diem---seize the check.
-- Robin Williams
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Thank you for using encryption!
iD8DBQFGwg8QBkIOoMqOI14RAuwoAKC0C65MJz1EDyABcTdTtKo3gIAS5gCdFGxB
lEAjcUjYS26S/Yqq6t1xotg=
=+mVm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----