Re: Is there no longer a --buffy-size option?

To: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Is there no longer a --buffy-size option?
From: Brendan Cully <brendan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 14:18:32 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=kublai.com; h=date:to: subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type: in-reply-to:from; q=dns/txt; s=dk; bh=SIiwWB5o/RTW9Qq1H/iXA9V6Eh 4=; b=hv22m7ZMjZllQb8dRN0Vmq68V4jOjkeeK6OmKp5U1DzdZOQEfmSXxp4IDS 67Ee3Rkgwa/pJVVRO9hEJqVnucqVPk+WWXKIRFaj4mjY1/KeHGLqxH+DGwDVJ0Gm J17qX4T0MNgnS5mJ3f8VOuU3DwJKJvlarW4E/utJXB/0tdLFI=
In-reply-to: <20070807210538.GA2414@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-post: <mailto:mutt-users@mutt.org>
List-unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users"
References: <20070807210538.GA2414@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-07-16)

On Tuesday, 07 August 2007 at 22:05, Chris G wrote:
> In the MuttFaq it says:-
> 
>     You can recompile Mutt with the --buffy-size option to
>     "configure".
> 
> ... but there isn't a --buffy-size option to 1.5.16, has it been
> removed or what?

It's now a muttrc variable, $check_mbox_size.

Attachment: pgpuPaqMjMJ2N.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is there no longer a --buffy-size option?
  - From: Chris G

References:
- Is there no longer a --buffy-size option?
  - From: Chris G

Prev by Date: Re: Is there no longer a --buffy-size option?
Next by Date: Re: Is there no longer a --buffy-size option?
Previous by thread: Re: Is there no longer a --buffy-size option?
Next by thread: Re: Is there no longer a --buffy-size option?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread