On Sat, Feb 10 2007 16:20, Travis H. wrote: > Anyone have any thoughts on the wisdom of this? > > Also, is there a canonical naming scheme? I use a leading period > for mailboxes that don't receive new mail (i.e. my outbox and > spam folders)... But I see Maildir++ uses those for subfolders, > and names with no leading period are special. Maildir++: "Folders are created as subdirectories under the main Maildir. The name of the subdirectory always starts with a period. For example, a folder named "Important" will be a subdirectory called ".Important". You can't have subdirectories that start with two periods." [...] "Can folders have subfolders, defined in a recursive fashion? The answer is no. If you want to have a client with a hierarchy of folders, emulate it. Pick a hierarchy separator character, say ":". Then, folder foo/bar is subdirectory .foo:bar." [1] 1. http://www.inter7.com/courierimap/README.maildirquota.html -- redondos
Attachment:
pgpUrnTv9SFG6.pgp
Description: PGP signature