Re: simulating "Aborted unmodified message" condition
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 11:09:41AM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On 2006-09-11, William Yardley <mutt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 08:47:59PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > I guess I could see if sending "Approved: boguspasswd" will work for the
> > third case - it's been a while, but I seem to remember that sending a
> > bogus password might just kill the message, though.
>
> Here's a thought: how about using message-hooks or reply-hooks to
> set the editor? Something like this:
>
> message-hook . "set editor=\"vim +'/^$/+2'\""
> message-hook <pattern in moderated mail> "set
> editor=~/bin/mutt_mailman_approve.pl"
That's a great idea! I'm definitely going to look into doing that!
w