* Kyle Wheeler <kyle-mutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2006-09-06 16:07]: > But I heartily disagree that simply because enscript doesn't support > Unicode that it's therefore *unusable*. It's absolutely still usable > for lots of purposes and for lots of people. Perhaps not for you, and > perhaps not for every German in the world, but in case you haven't > noticed, there's plenty of other folks on the planet too. Not all of > them are forced to use Unicode for every single thing they want to > print. Lots of people, for example, write programs in C, which is > designed to be a programming language that uses exclusively us-ascii > characters. Enscript is a great program for printing out C code, for > example. Of course, it's usable for printing out C code. I use it myself for this. But we talked about mails. :) > It seems ridiculous to me that you would claim that programs that > don't support Unicode are "unusable". Maybe they are for you, but that > certainly does not hold true for *everyone*. Of course there are persons that can use it with that issue. What I wanted to express: I consider missing of utf-8 support as very important TODO that should be fixed by upstream. Regards, Bernhard -- Es ist ein großer Vorteil im Leben, die Fehler, aus denen man lernen kann, möglichst früh zu begehen. -- Sir Winston Churchil
Attachment:
pgpA63NC7NKDR.pgp
Description: PGP signature