Re: index_format and <bar> vs <space>, segment fault
Hello,
On Monday, June 12, 2006 at 9:02:21 +0200, Ye Fei wrote:
> When reading Rado's message, my Mutt (Mutt 1.5.11+cvs20060403) stops
> working. It quits with a segment fault.
Take a look at the yet unsolved Debian Bug#339555 "Segmentation
fault when displaying a iso8859-1 mail header" to study if that's the
same thing. Especially check first the gdb backtrace.
> some "characters" which can not be treated correctly by mutt in the
> zh_CN.GBK locale.
Only a small minority of the Latin-1 chars of Rado's table are
displayable in a GBK locale. Mutt is able to display them, and masks
other ones with a question mark. That's the best you can have, unless
you change to a better terminal and locale, or use //TRANSLITerations.
> The original message by Rado is attached below.
How did you manage to quote it without segfault: <list-reply>
directly from index?
>| LANGUAGE=en_CN:en_US:en_GB:en:zh_CN
BTW: Unset it (unless you have a good reason).
>| set charset="gbk"
Drop it.
>| charset-hook ^gb2312$ gbk
Are you sure this really makes sense?
>| charset-hook ^iso-8859-1$ gbk
>| charset-hook !utf-8 gbk
Whatever intent you had, this looks to me like self-foot-shooting,
twice ;-). All incoming mails (outside of UTF-8 ones) are treated as if
they contained GBK. Which would be fine, if all mails really contained
GBK. But when mails contain whatever else, this gives you garbage.
Better drop both lines, and review original intent searching another
solution with fewer drawbacks.
Bye! Alain.
--
When you want to reply to a mailing list, please avoid doing so with
Lotus Notes 5. This lacks necessary references and breaks threads.