On 2004-11-21 09:53 +0100, roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > You shouldn't have to run gpg manually on *anything*. See > pgp-check-traditional. One thing I am finding it necessary to run gpg manually on, is the following scenario: * I *need* to use an inline signature (sending to someone with a broken MUA, no hope of getting them to fix that) * I wish to send any kind of attachment In that case, Mutt will tell me that inline signing is not possible and ask if it should revert to PGP/MIME. Would it be possible to add some kind of function native to Mutt to only sign a single part of the message? (The only way I can think of is pipe it through gpg and set Mutt to send in clear text.) Or maybe I am missing something? I have read through TFM and TFH but didn't notice anything like it. I am using Mutt from CVS back in late July. -- Michael Kjörling, michael@xxxxxxxxxxxx - http://michael.kjorling.com/ OpenPGP Fingerprint: 3723 9372 c245 d6a8 18a6 36ac 758F8749 BDE9ADA6 * ASCII Ribbon Campaign: Against HTML Mail, Proprietary Attachments * * No bird soars too high if he soars with his own wings. -*- SM0YBY *
Attachment:
pgpd7zIEJps64.pgp
Description: PGP signature