<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: Mutt encryption vs Kmail



On 23:51 Tue 16 Nov     , Alec Berryman wrote:
> begin  quotation of C Hamel on 2004-11-16 21:18:51 -0600:
> 
> > I am running SuSE 9 Pro and the mutt that comes with it.  Signing messages
> > is no problem but the encryption is not working correctly, apparently, as
> > nobody can open them except for me --and only in Mutt.  If generated w/Kmail
> > I cannot open them in Mutt & vice versa.
> 
> The last time I used Kmail it signed/encrypted inline, while Mutt's
> default is to use PGP/MIME.  I suspect this is your problem.  I don't
> know about Kmail, but you are able to choose between PGP/MIME and
> inline in mutt.  If you search around a bit, you can find procmail
> recipies to convert one to the other.
Many thanks for the pointer since I wasn't certain whose task it was to set 
that up --mutt or what.  I'll look into it.
-- 
..."Yogi" CH
Namasté Yoga Studio

Attachment: pgp2gynzb1mt7.pgp
Description: PGP signature