<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: pgp signatures?



 On Saturday, September 25, 2004 at 9:18:46 PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:  

> On 2004-09-25 19:42:41 +0200, Alain Bench wrote:  
>> GOOD. Originally had dots. But no QP, therefore no possible harmfull  
>> deQPification.  

    Same for test 2.  


> ups, so let's take a look at this one. ;-)  
> =2E  

    Aaah! This one is both GOOD and QP. That's unexpected behaviour.  
Hum... What about _3_ dots?  


Alain threedots Bench.  
-- 
Software should be written to deal with every conceivable error  
        RFC 1122 / Robustness Principle