On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 12:32:52PM EST, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 12:44:26AM -0500 I heard the voice of > David Yitzchak Cohen, and lo! it spake thus: > > There's nothing stopping you from ":r"ing to override your mail client's > > assumption no matter what, but that's no reason to shy away from allowing > > your client to guess correctly all by itself as often as possible. > > See? That's the fun; my mail client can't do an analysis of the > content of my message, and choose an appropriate ironic and snarky > .sig 8-} Your mail client _can_ make an intelligent guess, though, at least at part of your signature area (and can even suggest signatures by looking for keywords in your message). (If you're writing for a Hebrew list, for instance, it'd be silly to include your info in English, no?) Those of us with a 100% static signature can go one step further and have our mail client pick the entire signature fully automatically. - Dave -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgp7LWwUBQX9t.pgp
Description: PGP signature