On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 06:16:59PM EST, steVe wrote: > so spake Jens Paulus [2004.03.05 @ 16:51]: > > On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 17:08:20 -0500, David Yitzchak Cohen wrote: > > > Ewww ... please don't try to overload the postponed folder. . . > > > > I did not know that it causes problems to make much use of this folder. > > Normally I assume that a folder is theoretically no limited on the size. > > i think what dave meant by 'overload' was not putting too much stuff in > the folder, but rather, using the postponed folder for more than one > purpose. in other words, the postponed folder is for unfinished mails, > not for postponed mail delivery. That's precisely what I was referring to. As I pointed out in another post, using the postponed folder for both purposes means when you connect to the Internet, all your postponed emails are sent off in their half-finished state, which probably isn't what you want. - Dave -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgpV5tBxCBoEq.pgp
Description: PGP signature