On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 06:12:11AM EST, David Yitzchak Cohen wrote: > On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 05:33:34AM EST, Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado wrote: > > * David Yitzchak Cohen <lists+mutt_users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> dixit: > > I'll take a look at imapproxy ;) Should I use it like a > > '$tunnel'? > > Yes, it's invisible to Mutt. You simply launch it as if it were your > imapd, and it'll take care of everything else. In its current form, > though, it only supports local IMAP and SSH-tunneled IMAP connections. > If you give me an hour or so, I'll add TCP-based IMAP support. . . I guess it took a little more than an hour, but I've just finished adding TCP-based IMAP (courtesy of hose(1) from the netpipes package) functionality to imapproxy [1], and I've tested it as well to make sure it actually works :-) Enjoy, - Dave [1] http://www.bigfatdave.com/dave/src/imapproxy/ http://www.bigfatdave.com/dave/src/imapproxy.tgz -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgpDp3eRmNwVp.pgp
Description: PGP signature