On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 07:00:19AM EST, Hanspeter Roth wrote: > On Feb 28 at 12:49, Hanspeter Roth spoke: > > Ok. I append a somewhat stripped version which behaves the same as > > of the reply-hooks. > > Sorry, I forgot the attachment. > > -Hanspeter Okay, your config seemed reasonable, so I peeked in the source. Sure enough, send.c readily confirms that send-hooks are only executed after reply-hooks, with a short little comment indicating that you'll have to use the ~Q pattern in your send-hook conditions (! ~Q) if you don't want them clobbering your reply-hook settings. HTH, - Dave -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgpZ8jPZm53CN.pgp
Description: PGP signature