<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [OT] Assorted Fun (was: Re: imap issues)



* David Yitzchak Cohen <lists+mutt_users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2004-02-24 12:28] 
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 01:39:06AM EST, Colin J. Raven wrote:
> > * David Yitzchak Cohen <lists+mutt_users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2004-02-24 06:49] 
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 06:32:20PM EST, Colin J. Raven wrote:
> 
> > Thanks for an enormously detailed and helpful response! I couldn't have 
> > asked for better!!! (I guess I should have written "potentially helpful" 
> > to be boringly pedantic, because I'm going to have to read, re-read and 
> > inwardly digest the contents of your post)
[SNIPPAGE] 
> > Well, sorry for the excessive bandwidth, but thanks to the list for 
> > guidance and support. It's good to know it's there, and hopefully I can 
> > contribute as my own knowledge grows, ths maintaining the essential 
> > "balance".
> 
> Yeah :-)
> 
> A good rule of thumb is to strive for at least a few [OT] posts for
> each non-[OT] one.  Flagging OT messages as OT is a good idea, though,
> since some grumpy gramps here start to grumble a little (just a teensy
> weensy wittle bit) when they see OT stuff not clearly marked as such.

ECtoowalleeeeee, I think it was really ON-Topic since it (inadvertently) 
evangelized Mutt more than just a little. :-)


>  - Dave [who thinks you need to fix your MFT header]

<baffled look>
WTH is an MFT header, and how would I fix it?
</baffled look>