Re: burst digests?

To: Mutt Users' List <mutt-users@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: burst digests?
From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 16:59:32 +0100
In-reply-to: <20040122043124.GF20081@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Mutt Users' List <mutt-users@xxxxxxxx>
References: <20040122024438.GE20081@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040122031012.GJ9720@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040122043124.GF20081@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i

On 2004-01-21 23:31:24 -0500, Stephen wrote:

> As long as the relevant return info, and correct subject is kept,
> that's OK. I only want to burst individual messages, that I'm
> responding/replying to.  That's why I'm hoping for a mutt
> solution, as opposed to formail/procmail one.

Try pressing "v", and make sure that $digest_collapse is set.  You
can then use the usual message functions on individual
message/rfc822-type attachments.

-- 
Thomas Roessler · Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: burst digests?
  - From: Stephen

References:
- burst digests?
  - From: Stephen
- Re: burst digests?
  - From: David T-G
- Re: burst digests?
  - From: Stephen

Prev by Date: Re: maildir structure and change dir
Next by Date: pager_format - is this a bug ?
Previous by thread: [OT] About Nostalgia & Text Editors (was: Re: burst digests?)
Next by thread: Re: burst digests?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread