Re: burst digests?
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 10:10:12PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> maildir spool) and there you are. But that's only if they're real
> messages that are attached to an email instead of the sad shadows that
> they have been in my experience.
if they were the full message, of course, then there'd be little
point to receiving them in one delayed go - no space saving, etc.
Mush used to be able to open one up and interpret it as a set of mails
(subject to only having certain fields). It would be nifty if someone
were able to make Mutt handle them in a similar way..
James.