* Michael Tatge <Michael.Tatge@xxxxxx> [2004:01:21:05:17:45+0100] scribed: > * On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 Michael D Schleif (mds@xxxxxxxxxxx) muttered: > > * Michael Tatge <Michael.Tatge@xxxxxx> [2004:01:21:03:32:32+0100] scribed: > > > * On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 Michael D Schleif (mds@xxxxxxxxxxx) muttered: > > > > > > > > Subject: TEST #1 > > > > Message-ID: 1073710002-7884@mimetools > ^ ^ > > > > Subject: TEST #2 > > > > Message-ID: 1073710002-12669@mimetools > ^ ^ > > > > Clearly, each message contains a Message-ID header > > > > > > Why yes but a broken one. See http://cr.yp.to/immhf/thread.html > > "In theory a message identifier is tokenizable; it contains a < token, > an encoded address, and a > token." > > The main point is <> are missing. Add them and try link-threads again. > > > I do not know what is `822bis'; nor do I take issue with DJB's point; > > but, the fact remains that the following string is decidedly _absent_ > > from my cited RFC's: > > > > ``SHOULD be the domain name of the host on which it was created'' > > rfc 822: > msg-id = "<" addr-spec ">" ; Unique message id > addr-spec = local-part "@" domain ; global address Touche! Thank you. I've been staring at these pair of messages for three days, and I did not notice that difference ;< O, I need to get my eyes checked, perhaps on a bright sandy beach in the Caribbean . . . -- Best Regards, mds mds resource 877.596.8237 - Dare to fix things before they break . . . - Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we think we know. The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . . --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature