On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 07:06:37AM -0500, David T-G wrote: > ...and then David Yitzchak Cohen said... > % > % On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 06:07:55PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > ... > % > problem understanding the *statement*. Tks agn > % > % I thought "thanks" was supposed to be abbreviated "thnks" or at least > % "tnks." "Tks" makes it sound a bit like those things that leech onto > % you when you walk around the forest with shorts. . . > > I always preferred 'thx' to abbreviate 'thanks'. Like "thx e+06" :-) THX actually sounds like some Dolby commercial or something, but I really shouldn't be replying now since it's now four days later (and I'm feeling much better, having spent those four at an Internet-less resort hotel). . . > [OK, I promise to quit trying to keep this behemoth alive.] Yeah, ditto here, so HAVND, folks, - Dave -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgpccVgMth057.pgp
Description: PGP signature