* Chris Green <chris at areti.co.uk> [2003-11-17 16:30]:
> There seem to be two ways to implement a directory hierarchy in a
> maildir environment:-
>
> 1 - Conventional directory hierarchy. A mailbox may contain both
> the cur, tmp and new subdirectories *and* further maibox
> subdirectories.
>
> 2 - The dotted directory naming convention used by Courier (and
> others) where each named mailbox is given a name like
> topLevel.nextLevel.bottomlevel and these directories contain
> *only* cur, tmo and new subdirectories.
>
> Can mutt cope with both these approaches? Are both these approaches
> 'correct'?
I've never used the second, and have been using Maildir and mutt
together for about three years. I've also never seen a good explanation
for why the second is needed.
(darren)
--
How is it possible to find meaning in a finite world, given my waist
and shirt size?
-- Woody Allen
Attachment:
pgpf2e3Hetlzx.pgp
Description: PGP signature