* Chris Green <chris at areti.co.uk> [2003-11-17 16:30]: > There seem to be two ways to implement a directory hierarchy in a > maildir environment:- > > 1 - Conventional directory hierarchy. A mailbox may contain both > the cur, tmp and new subdirectories *and* further maibox > subdirectories. > > 2 - The dotted directory naming convention used by Courier (and > others) where each named mailbox is given a name like > topLevel.nextLevel.bottomlevel and these directories contain > *only* cur, tmo and new subdirectories. > > Can mutt cope with both these approaches? Are both these approaches > 'correct'? I've never used the second, and have been using Maildir and mutt together for about three years. I've also never seen a good explanation for why the second is needed. (darren) -- How is it possible to find meaning in a finite world, given my waist and shirt size? -- Woody Allen
Attachment:
pgpf2e3Hetlzx.pgp
Description: PGP signature