On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 05:42:05PM -0500, Todd wrote: > If you aren't going to look at the output of gpg, then you could just > > :unset pgp_verify_sig That's not what he means. (No, I can't read his mind. I just remember the last time he asked this question ... and my answer, too. . .) > If you are only looking to get rid of the lines you quoted while > keeping the gpg: output, then I'd think a display_filter would be > easiest. Eww ... a display_filter is really the wrong way to solve this problem. Electing not to use Mutt's built-in functionality and instead invoking your own using hooks (or filters) is the wrong way to solve problems with how Mutt's built-in functionality works. If you look at my mailing list setup (posted a few minutes ago in another message), you'll notice that I do just that with Mutt's From: header generation functionality. Don't get me wrong, here: the fact that Mutt allows you to do just that sort of thing is one of the most important reasons that Mutt is the best mail client I've ever used (much better than ELM in many ways), but when you find yourself having to use that ability more often than not, you know too many arbitrary decisions have been made in implementing Mutt's built-in functionality. Having that silly PGP crap wasting lines on the display by default isn't the end of the world, but not being able to get rid of such an obvious annoyance is really unacceptable, IMHO. Therefore, David: Please file a wishlist "bug" report. Coding a patch to implement that change is trivial for anybody familiar with the relevant code. If you file the bug report and nobody else steps forward, email me and I'll hack up a patch just out of spite. - Dave -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgpJrvU8lsn8S.pgp
Description: PGP signature