On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 09:30:44AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > Why do you have to invoke mutt several times for this? That doesn't seem > > like the best way to do it - what's wrong with mailboxes= and 'c'? Also, > > you could re-bind x or q or whatever you use to exit mutt to go to the > > next mailbox instead? > > The list of mailboxes is dynamically generated, and using "x" or "q" > would require temporary files which result in all kinds of problems. So, why not just write a script which spits out the appropriate mutt syntax to name those mailboxes, like this: unmailboxes * mailboxes foo mailboxes bar mailboxes etc Then source the script in .muttrc, like this: source ~/bin/myscript| I'm not really clear on what sort of problem you're trying to solve, so I'm not sure how helpful this would be... -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail. Sorry for the inconvenience. Thank the spammers.
Attachment:
pgphXyqOkEAWF.pgp
Description: PGP signature