Todd <Freedom_Lover@xxxxxxxxx> [2003:09:16:21:19:13-0400] scribed: > Michael D Schleif wrote: <snip /> > I don't get any lists in digest format so I've never used this, but does > this command from the formail man page help? > > To split up a digest one usually uses: > formail +1 -ds >>the_mailbox_of_your_choice > or > formail +1 -ds procmail Patrick Shanahan <WideGlide@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2003:09:16:20:31:17-0500] scribed: > * Michael D Schleif <mds@xxxxxxxxxxx> [09-16-03 19:52]: > > Patrick Shanahan <WideGlide@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2003:09:16:13:45:10-0500] > > scribed: > > > > > > Save the digest file to a text file and: > > > formail -s procmail < file.txt > > > > This does not do what I want ;< > > > > Perhaps, I am missing some arcane procmail rule? > > > > All it does is put the entire ``digest'' back into my inbox. > > > > What I want is *all* of the attachments saved as individual and > > distinct email messages -- exactly the same as if I received them one > > at a time. > > Left one letter out, > formail -d -s procmail < file.txt Yes, this does the trick! I knew that I'd seen it somewhere, and man formail doesn't list arguments alphabetically. In fact, even when I found -d, I misread it and doubted that my attachments would work. But, it does and I am happy! Thank you, both Todd and Patrick . . . -- Best Regards, mds mds resource 877.596.8237 - Dare to fix things before they break . . . - Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we think we know. The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . . --
Attachment:
pgpBo1wMSk39U.pgp
Description: PGP signature