John, et al -- ...and then John Iverson said... % % On Thu 11 Sep 2003 at 06:34pm -0400, David T-G wrote: % % > by saying "limit to those with ~m > insert_curr_here" but it's a painful % > method that I'd much rather have automated. % % Other than maybe finding a patch that allows you to retrieve the Yeah. % current message number, the closest automatic way I can think of % is something like: % % macro index ,z <tag-pattern>~A<enter><last-entry><tag-entry><limit>!~T<enter> Oooh, that's a good oen! % % which should limit away everything but the last message while % letting you see new mail as it comes in. That sounds like an excellent approach; thanks! I'll have to remember that items are tagged, but that can work. In fact, I think I might reverse it; tag only the last, limit to tagged, and then untag the last to be safe :-) I just tested the latter approach and it works, so I'll next come up with the macro and be one happy camper. % % > TIA & HAN % % Have a nice what? Oops! :-) % % -- % John Thanks again & HAND :-D -- David T-G * There is too much animal courage in (play) davidtg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx * society and not sufficient moral courage. (work) davidtgwork@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Mary Baker Eddy, "Science and Health" http://justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
Attachment:
pgpIGqxWj1lRR.pgp
Description: PGP signature