Re: [PATCH] crypt-gpgme: actually init gpgme

To: Roman Kagan <rkagan@xxxxxxx>, mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypt-gpgme: actually init gpgme
From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:27:02 +0100
In-reply-to: <20101123114152.GA2509@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-post: <mailto:mutt-dev@mutt.org>
List-unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-dev"
Organization: Gentoo Foundation, Inc.
References: <20101123114152.GA2509@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (Darwin 9.8.0, VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3)

On 23-11-2010 14:41:52 +0300, Roman Kagan wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Roman Kagan <rkagan@xxxxxxx>
> # Date 1290506473 -10800
> # Node ID 938f0706311a6ab599d29d35447f0c70972fe7cf
> # Parent  01731fb1884ea0e1eaf9008ea9c70804b66f2363
> crypt-gpgme: actually init gpgme

This may be an improved patch over the one from bug #3300

http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/3300

Maybe add it there as possible replacement of the patch we use now?

Thanks,

-- 
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] crypt-gpgme: actually init gpgme
  - From: Roman Kagan

References:
- [PATCH] crypt-gpgme: actually init gpgme
  - From: Roman Kagan

Prev by Date: [PATCH] crypt-gpgme: actually init gpgme
Next by Date: Re: [Mutt] #3472: Lines over 1024 in message body are broken, possibly also broking multi-byte charsets
Previous by thread: [PATCH] crypt-gpgme: actually init gpgme
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] crypt-gpgme: actually init gpgme
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread