Re: [Mutt] #3117: CRLF not consequently stripped

To: pdmef@xxxxxxx, brendan@xxxxxxxxxx, mutt.org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Mutt] #3117: CRLF not consequently stripped
From: Mutt <fleas@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:54:43 -0000
Auto-submitted: auto-generated
Cc: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <037.edc8b73d9d7673ac455014fe59876ab5@xxxxxxxx>
List-post: <mailto:mutt-dev@mutt.org>
List-unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-dev"
Mail-followup-to: fleas@xxxxxxxx
References: <037.edc8b73d9d7673ac455014fe59876ab5@xxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: fleas@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx

#3117: CRLF not consequently stripped
---------------------+------------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  pdmef    |       Owner:  pdmef   
     Type:  defect   |      Status:  accepted
 Priority:  minor    |   Milestone:  1.6     
Component:  display  |     Version:  1.5.18  
 Keywords:  crlf ^M  |  
---------------------+------------------------------------------------------
Changes (by rsc):

 * cc: mutt.org@â (added)


-- 
Ticket URL: <http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/3117#comment:6>
Mutt <http://www.mutt.org/>
The Mutt mail user agent

References:
- [Mutt] #3117: CRLF not consequently stripped
  - From: Mutt

Prev by Date: Re: [Mutt] #2898: mutt-1.5.14: mutt's pager should strip spurrious ^M, most of the time
Next by Date: Re: [Mutt] #3067: PGP/MIME signatures incorrectly assigned "Content-Disposition: inline"
Previous by thread: Re: [Mutt] #3117: CRLF not consequently stripped
Next by thread: sort=date-received messed-up after attachement deletion
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread