Re: #1611: mutt erroneously omits information in parenthesis after addresses in Cc headers
- To: fleas@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: #1611: mutt erroneously omits information in parenthesis after addresses in Cc headers
- From: Gregor Zattler <telegraph@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 01:44:43 +0200
- Cc: md@xxxxxxxx, agriffis@xxxxxxxxx, antonio@xxxxxxxx, me@xxxxxxxx, vincent@xxxxxxxxxx, mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx, 206364@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <067.da75bc372e49a56cb804b8ca6ef0f381@xxxxxxxx>
- List-post: <mailto:mutt-dev@mutt.org>
- List-unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-dev"
- Mail-followup-to: fleas@xxxxxxxx, md@xxxxxxxx, agriffis@xxxxxxxxx, antonio@xxxxxxxx, me@xxxxxxxx, vincent@xxxxxxxxxx, mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx, 206364@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <058.5470dc9c0eb0dbb9c086c181fa4c67a5@xxxxxxxx> <067.da75bc372e49a56cb804b8ca6ef0f381@xxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Hi mutt developers and package maintainer,,
* Mutt <fleas@xxxxxxxx> [05. Aug. 2010]:
> #1611: mutt erroneously omits information in parenthesis after addresses in Cc
> headers
> -----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
> Reporter: Marco d'Itri <md@â> | Owner: mutt-dev
> Type: defect | Status: closed
> Priority: minor | Milestone:
> Component: mutt | Version: 1.5.20
> Resolution: invalid | Keywords:
> -----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
> Changes (by me):
>
> * status: new => closed
> * resolution: => invalid
[... for actual bug report see thread ..]
>
> Comment:
>
> This is the purpose of the --enable-exact-address option to configure. It
> is not enabled by default because it uses a lot of extra memory and most
> people don't really care since the commented form of the RFC2822 address
> is rarely used.
Then this option should be enabled by default, at least for Debian?
Ciao, Gregor