On Wednesday, 14 April 2010 at 12:42, David Champion wrote: > * On 14 Apr 2010, Brendan Cully wrote: > > > > I don't think it's clear what makes the security menu more deserving > > of hints than others. > > No objection to leaving that out, but the reason I did that is most of > items on the compose menu have exactly one keystroke that more or less > matches the initial of the field. Security, if taken analogously, would > lead you only to (S)/MIME, and (p)GP would be unindicated. (I assume > that's why the code formerly flipped the field name around depending on > options.) Yeah, I'm not crazy about the interface. ME and I were kicking around the idea of having one menu for the security type (sign, encrypt, both, sign as, encrypt with) and a different top-level menu for the encryption type (inline, PGP/MIME, S/MIME).
Attachment:
pgpiDC6ZoT9Qy.pgp
Description: PGP signature