<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: Seeing a core dump with latest mutt



(by the way, as far as I can tell this code path has been in mutt
since it first entered version control)

On Monday, 08 March 2010 at 15:01, Brendan Cully wrote:
> Looks like regfree shouldn't be called there, since regcomp has
> failed. Give 6059:05cec973f0d9 a try.
> 
> On Friday, 05 March 2010 at 17:20, Will Fiveash wrote:
> > Trying to run Mutt 1.5.20 (2010-03-02) I'm seeing it core dump with this
> > stack:
> > 
> > core 'mutt.28601.core' of 28601:        /home/willf/bin/i386/mutt willf
> >  fe529982 process_free (deadbeef, 1, 0, fea6c8fa) + 22
> >  fe529a7a free     (deadbeef, feae2000, 8044bf8, fea6e34a) + 1a
> >  fea6e383 __regfree_std (fe341f90, 820c3a0, 0, fea63950) + 43
> >  fea6396e regfree  (820c3a0, 820c3a0, 8046450, 100) + 2a
> >  080bb1ac eat_regexp (820c3d0, 8044c60, 8046430, 66) + 1c4
> >  080bc64b mutt_pattern_comp (814da90, 1, 8046430, 0) + 5d0
> >  0809dbc9 mutt_parse_hook (80462a0, 8046240, 10, 8046430) + 47e
> >  080925ec mutt_parse_rc_line (81f0648, 80462a0, 8046430, feea923e) + 138
> >  08092286 source_rc (81717b8, 8046430, 8046b88, 8094770) + 166
> >  08094785 mutt_init (0, 0, 80473c8, 80a1336) + c24
> >  080a134e main     (2, 80473f8, 8047404, feffb804, 80473ec, 806788a) + 751
> >  080678eb _start   (2, 80475b8, 80475d2, 0, 80475d8, 80475fa) + 83
> > 
> > I think the cause is this line in my .muttrc:
> > 
> > save-hook '~f foo\.bar@(something|other)\.com' =foo
> > 
> > If I change this to:
> > 
> > save-hook '~f "foo\.bar@(something|other)\.com"' =foo
> > 
> > then no core.
> >