Re: [Mutt] #1611: mutt erroneously omits information in parenthesis
#1611: mutt erroneously omits information in parenthesis after addresses in Cc
headers
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
Reporter: Marco d'Itri <md@xxxxxxxx> | Owner: mutt-dev
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: mutt | Version: 1.5.20
Resolution: | Keywords:
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
Comment(by Derek Martin):
{{{
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:43:02PM -0000, Mutt wrote:
Keep reading. See section 4.
Note in particular, in section 4, first paragraph:
4. Obsolete Syntax
Earlier versions of this specification allowed for different (usually
more liberal) syntax than is allowed in this version. Also, there
have been syntactic elements used in messages on the Internet whose
interpretations have never been documented. Though these syntactic
forms MUST NOT be generated according to the grammar in section 3,
they MUST be accepted and parsed by a conformant receiver. This
section documents many of these syntactic elements. Taking the
grammar in section 3 and adding the definitions presented in this
section will result in the grammar to use for the interpretation of
messages.
See also section 4.4, and RFC 822.
Sigh.
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/1611#comment:>
Mutt <http://www.mutt.org/>
The Mutt mail user agent