Re: [PATCH] add sendbox feature
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 01:51:58PM -0400, Aron Griffis wrote:
>
> Moreover it all falls apart when bouncing (remailing)
> messages, because that code path calls mutt_invoke_sendmail
> directly, and of course no fcc is done.
In any case bouncing can't work with courier's Outbox feature, as all
message headers are parsed for recipients who will all receive (again)
the message. Whereas bouncing is all about sending the message to
another non-header recipient.
How can you reconcile these two (apparently incompatible) modes of
operation?