Re: [Mutt] #3101: backtics or backticks?

To: jhawk@xxxxxxx, pdmef@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Mutt] #3101: backtics or backticks?
From: Mutt <fleas@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:42:38 -0000
Cc: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <037.0f20894ed26c1b5c55dea332d99c6c98@xxxxxxxx>
List-post: <mailto:mutt-dev@mutt.org>
List-unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-dev"
Mail-followup-to: fleas@xxxxxxxx
References: <037.0f20894ed26c1b5c55dea332d99c6c98@xxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: fleas@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx

#3101: backtics or backticks?

Changes (by pdmef):

  * status:  new => closed
  * resolution:  => fixed

Comment:

 (In [508ffc26dad2]) Prefer "backtick" over "backtic" on comments and docs
 as it's more common, closes #3101.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/3101#comment:1>

References:
- [Mutt] #3101: backtics or backticks?
  - From: Mutt

Prev by Date: [Mutt] #3101: backtics or backticks?
Next by Date: Re: [Mutt] #3087: No server hostname validation in SSL certificate
Previous by thread: [Mutt] #3101: backtics or backticks?
Next by thread: qdbm successor
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread