Re: [Mutt] #3090: Mutt removes In-Reply-To header field
#3090: Mutt removes In-Reply-To header field
Comment (by pdmef):
Replying to [comment:5 vinc17]:
> > A fix could be to avoid writing out In-Reply-To and use References
instead which still gives the user the chance to manually adjust threads
in the editor.
>
> That's a bad idea: some MUA's only understand the In-Reply-To header
(but this is quite old, and I don't remember which ones -- perhaps Emacs,
at least I can see that it doesn't generate a References header).
I didn't mean to eventually sent this out, I meant to use References
instead of In-Reply-To when creating and parsing the message during
editing to avoid changing message parsers this late before 1.6 and still
fix the issue before it gets released.
--
Ticket URL: <http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/3090#comment:7>