Re: [Mutt] #2967: limit could be smarter about filtering
#2967: limit could be smarter about filtering
Comment (by pdmef):
Actually that's the case: see perform_and() and perform_or() in pattern.c.
A simple '~d<1m~bfoo' limit is way faster than '~bfoo~d<1m' on a folder
with many message older than one month.
Do you have any numbers suggesting that in '~L dato ~b mutt' all messages
not matching '~L dato' get body-scanned, too?
I think this ticket can be closed unless you still want patterns to be run
through an optimizer prior to execution, i.e. a feature request.
--
Ticket URL: <http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/2967#comment:2>