<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: Little code cleanup



On 2008-03-03 12:37:06 +0100, Sébastien Hinderer wrote:
> Vincent Lefevre (2008/03/03 11:32 +0100):
> > And what if a part of the code changes? Such tests would allow
> > problem detection after such changes.
> 
> Do you mean that every locally-allocated pointer should always be
> checked, because the code may change in such a way that the pointer
> becomes non-locally allocated, hence risking to be NULL ?

Not all of them. But is there any reason why the check was added
here?

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)