Re: [PATCH] compose to sender
On 2008-03-03, Brian Salter-Duke <b_duke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 02:30:42PM -0800, Gary A. Johnson wrote:
> > On 2008-03-02, Patrick Shanahan <ptilopteri@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > * Rado S <list2rado@xxxxxx> [03-02-08 15:27]:
> > > > =- Thomas Roessler wrote on Fri 29.Feb'08 at 9:32:19 +0100 -=
> > > > > On 2008-02-29 00:07:29 -0800, William Yardley wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Would be great if there were also a 'compose to list' option.
> > > > > > Not sure if it would be better to have the function compose to
> > > > > > the list if the message is to a subscribed list, or to have a
> > > > > > different command for "compose to list".
> > > > >
> > > > > Why isn't list-reply close enough for that?
> > > >
> > > > Because you don't want to reply to an existing thread but start a
> > > > new one.
> > > > I have aliases for that. ;)
> > >
> > > And you will provide an example ?? :^)
> >
> > Here's an example of what I use, one for each list to which I post.
> >
> > folder-hook +Incoming/mutt-dev \
> > 'macro index M "<mail>mutt-dev^M^M" "mail to list"'
> > folder-hook +Incoming/mutt-users \
> > 'macro index M "<mail>mutt-users^M^M" "mail to list"'
> >
> > The second ^M in each of those skips the "Cc:" prompt.
> >
> > HTH,
> > Gary
>
> Gary, that is very usefull. However is there a way to add something so
> it does not say "No Subject: Abort? ([Yes]/No"? Maybe set abort_nosubject
> for this folder to ask=no and add <enter> somewhere. Any thoughts?
I forgot to mention that. A consequence of excessive multitasking,
I think. At least that's my excuse.
I have mutt configured so that when I initiate a message, must first
asks for "To:", then "Cc:", then "Subject:", then enters the editor.
I think that's a consequence of
set askcc
in my muttrc.
If you are getting that message, your mutt is probably not asking
"Cc:" and my macro is answering "Subject:" with Enter. Unless you
want to be asked "Cc:" all the time, you can just remove one of the
^M in the macro.
HTH,
Gary