Re: Bug#295432: Should not wrap format=flowed text

To: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Bug#295432: Should not wrap format=flowed text
From: Rocco Rutte <pdmef@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:42:46 +0100
Cc: 295432@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050215203228.GA26463@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-post: <mailto:mutt-dev@mutt.org>
List-unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-dev"
Mail-followup-to: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx, 295432@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20050215195558.GA17011@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050215200021.GN6294@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050215203228.GA26463@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-01-14)

Hi,

* bbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 09:00:21PM +0100, Thomas Roessler 
<roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


[ flow f=f instead of wrap ]

See RFC 2119, on the meaning of "MAY." Mutt's behavior is compliant.

True, but perhaps this is still valid with a severity of "wishlist"?

Recent versions of mutt properly support flowing including support forDelSp as of RfC3676.


Rocco

References:
- Bug#295432: Should not wrap format=flowed text
  - From: Marco d'Itri
- Re: Bug#295432: Should not wrap format=flowed text
  - From: Thomas Roessler
- Re: Bug#295432: Should not wrap format=flowed text
  - From: bbell