Re: [PATCH] use bdb automatically
- To: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] use bdb automatically
- From: Brendan Cully <brendan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 12:16:17 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=kublai.com; h=date:to: subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type: in-reply-to:from; q=dns/txt; s=dk; bh=3u4K8lWKPnEjdv95RNBg3w5osF I=; b=lGFMGMFdKhMOQLEAvC+QmDGKQ2A78Kuhp/tXxHWVoy1V/3iHlZmm0kQlXg 6W40sdAxeo9hiaacqL31/KnYxqUD0lMOAZo3qb1qEzJtNEOSYYY9Rc8l9lrOS/gW oZer8WxRmgZwmTh6EpZm+7mi+dwmmQ1/C2ThMiVt1FWm8gwWQ=
- In-reply-to: <20071013122440.GA13640@xxxxxxxxxx>
- List-post: <mailto:mutt-dev@mutt.org>
- List-unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-dev"
- Mail-followup-to: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
- References: <20071013122440.GA13640@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-11-01)
On Saturday, 13 October 2007 at 14:24, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> moin,
>
> as from the configure sources no reason becomes apparent why bdb should
> not be automatically used, but it still isn't, the attached patch fixes
> this behavior.
>
Thanks. I've pushed a slightly easier to read version of this.
Attachment:
pgprOUJis8vBH.pgp
Description: PGP signature