Re: [Mutt] #2882: segfaults in uxterm with > 254 columns if there

To: cb@xxxxxxxx, pdmef@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Mutt] #2882: segfaults in uxterm with > 254 columns if there
From: Mutt <fleas@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 09:09:01 -0000
Cc: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx, 420598@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <036.5f76855b4c25c5d51adf17733926e97b@xxxxxxxx>
List-post: <mailto:mutt-dev@mutt.org>
List-unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-dev"
Mail-followup-to: fleas@xxxxxxxx
References: <036.5f76855b4c25c5d51adf17733926e97b@xxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: fleas@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx

#2882: segfaults in uxterm with > 254 columns if there are single byte

Comment (by pdmef):

 mutt_FormatString() is now supposed to be mostly multibyte-safe, including
 padding with multibyte characters. Can you please report if you still have
 problems? Otherwise I'd like to close this ticket.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/2882#comment:6>

References:
- [Mutt] #2882: segfaults in uxterm with > 254 columns if there are single byte 8-bit characters in index_format
  - From: Mutt

Prev by Date: Re: [Mutt] #2917: fixed sections of format=flowed messages can wrap
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] fix indent_string handling with format=flowed
Previous by thread: Re: [Mutt] #2882: segfaults in uxterm with > 254 columns if there
Next by thread: Re: [Mutt] #2882: segfaults in uxterm with > 254 columns if there
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread