[breen.mullins@xxxxxxxxx: Re: Mailing list reply]

[Kyle Wheeler <kyle-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

This is a suggestion from mutt-users... anyone have any comments?

> > P.S. I've often thought something like an addr-hook, that forces 
> > specific addresses to be treated as something else (akin to a 
> > charset-hook, kinda) would be pretty useful, and such a thing would 
> > solve the problem here, as long as mutt eliminates duplicate 
> > recipients. For example:
> >
> >     addr-hook listname@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx listname@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Now _that's_ an interesting idea! I tend to get mails addressed to 
> collections of people - a church group, for example - where one 
> recipient has changed her address. (Old directories take a long time 
> to die.) With an addr-hook, I could make the change and a group 
> reply would go to the new address even if the message had only the 
> old address for that person. 

~Kyle
--
No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of 
another, and this is all from which the laws ought to restrain him.
                                     -- Thomas Jefferson, July 7, 1786

Attachment: pgpebLUe41UlP.pgp
Description: PGP signature