Re: [PATCH] Double include of config.h

To: Dan Fandrich <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Double include of config.h
From: Brendan Cully <brendan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 10:42:47 -0700
Cc: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=kublai.com; h=date:to:cc: subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type: in-reply-to:from; q=dns/txt; s=dk; bh=0+twcxUTZjGAnBv4oar59pZCya U=; b=c2BwM9e2b3D7dH8uYqGfHJ9cI2gDHlgMtm0C7selIyTYMhKK5OdmuTRD5S UUj6v/0FGN0lyI6PGvNpvTHRRTxXGy1ynkJNyT81UyaMp/JU0zcM7LcT2tLjQ7bo mYTYad53b2+csZKFNauN3Q21XaYhe9g7AfJGFlrenCpXHc6TU=
In-reply-to: <20070627061524.GB1730@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-post: <mailto:mutt-dev@mutt.org>
List-unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-dev"
Mail-followup-to: dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
References: <20070627061524.GB1730@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)

On Tuesday, 26 June 2007 at 23:15, Dan Fandrich wrote:
> The attached patch to 1.5.16 fixes a double inclusion of config.h. This
> causes a compile failure on some compilers (e.g. old gcc) if config.h defines
> a typedef.

Applied (to dotlock.c, not mutt_dotlock.c). Thanks.

References:
- [PATCH] Double include of config.h
  - From: Dan Fandrich

Prev by Date: [PATCH] Incorrect pager percentage
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Incorrect pager percentage
Previous by thread: [PATCH] Double include of config.h
Next by thread: [PATCH] Incorrect pager percentage
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread