Re: [Mutt] #2885: Buffer overflows in mutt_gecos_name

To: mutt@xxxxxxxx, brendan@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Mutt] #2885: Buffer overflows in mutt_gecos_name
From: Mutt <fleas@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 16:33:45 -0000
Cc: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <038.fe1df9be176adea386e4a12e0eff1236@xxxxxxxx>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-dev-request@mutt.org?Subject="Unsubscribe Mutt Dev"?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: fleas@xxxxxxxx
References: <038.fe1df9be176adea386e4a12e0eff1236@xxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: fleas@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx

#2885: Buffer overflows in mutt_gecos_name

Changes (by brendan):

  * owner:  mutt-dev => brendan
  * status:  new => assigned
  * milestone:  => 1.6

Comment:

 I don't see the bug here. It looks like MAX(destlen - idx -pwnl - 1, 0)
 does the same thing your check is supposed to do.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/2885#comment:2>

References:
- [Mutt] #2885: Buffer overflows in mutt_gecos_name
  - From: Mutt

Prev by Date: Re: [Mutt] #2886: inconsistent use of backslash in regexps
Next by Date: Re: [Mutt] #2886: inconsistent use of backslash in regexps
Previous by thread: Re: [Mutt] #2885: Buffer overflows in mutt_gecos_name
Next by thread: Re: [Mutt] #2885: Buffer overflows in mutt_gecos_name
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread