--- Begin Message ---
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.10-1
Severity: normal
If I try to forward an attachment of type text/rfc822-headers, mutt will
forward it in-line and with lots of headers deleted. This happens even if I
explicitly "set mime_forward".
It is thus currently impossible to forward "full headers" for spam reporting if
the only headers available are inside a text/rfc822-headers attachment.
(Workaround is to save the attachment to a file, then insert the file from the
text editor. Therefore the bug is "normal" and not "important".)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.28-ow1
Locale: LANG=zh_TW.Big5, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.Big5 (charmap=BIG5)
Versions of packages mutt depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.5-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libdb4.3 4.3.29-1 Berkeley v4.3 Database Libraries [
ii libgnutls11 1.0.16-13.1 GNU TLS library - runtime library
ii libidn11 0.5.18-1 GNU libidn library, implementation
ii libncursesw5 5.5-1 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libsasl2 2.1.19-1.7 Authentication abstraction library
ii postfix [mail-transport-agen 2.2.4-1.0.1 A high-performance mail transport
Versions of packages mutt recommends:
ii locales 2.3.5-8 GNU C Library: National Language (
ii mime-support 3.35-1 MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi
sorry for the late reply; such bounces are hard to come by (most have the
complete mail in them, and I don't know how to make an artificial sample).
I just got the odd one (which is also an odd one) today.
Please find a sample mbox attached.
Regards,
Ambrose
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 04:50:57AM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
> Hi, any updates on this? Thanks.
>
> * Adeodato Sim?? [Thu, 24 Nov 2005 01:55:40 +0100]:
>
> > * Ambrose Li [Wed, 23 Nov 2005 17:20:24 -0500]:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > > If I try to forward an attachment of type text/rfc822-headers, mutt
> > > will forward it in-line and with lots of headers deleted. This happens
> > > even if I explicitly "set mime_forward".
>
> > > It is thus currently impossible to forward "full headers" for spam
> > > reporting if the only headers available are inside a
> > > text/rfc822-headers attachment.
>
> > There are several more forwarding-related options; could I have a
> > sample mbox to test?
>
> > If not, what are the value of your $mime_forward_decode and
> > $mime_forward_rest variables? Also, if you set $mime_forward to no,
> > does unsetting $forward_decode help?
>
> > > (Workaround is to save the attachment to a file, then insert the file
> > > from the text editor. Therefore the bug is "normal" and not
> > > "important".)
>
> > As a last resort, I believe you could also unset $weed.
>
> > I wait your feedback on this bug report,
>
>
> --
> Adeodato Sim?? dato at net.com.org.es
> Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
>
> Everything you read in newspapers is absolutely true, except for that
> rare story of which you happen to have first-hand knowledge.
> -- Erwin Knoll
>
?K(D340506-sample.mbox 冬io榎?螵Q獍$絣?l? (^p$.a覣F悃
?
??嵣?諾澂8v2?(QZ}T鋸漯?o烆?曆胉)?鄫?4\?L]w??釁/r??!?T脥|旼??0U滏<c?迶x<?4Ngp鐬TLjT決??5洩y
%豫h婀??$?NwGKv祑軺#?6i?8靉?"A??|?,d?
e8???7?f"?T?7?"榣?*嗝W螳?8??sx^?,??宏k楛??|???C?
L扮T潛?獚?豯QSR?孤*裫?v?楺升x?京6eI??<^?貪??%5ujW姆:O展U???>GO??$
vz~kp?
>/p?OP)笆
>NR1冹*A??岆x?-j5W幁?????^.??'韞?\B<鑣?s`??p彞砑t?iy~o郈>J活?崙