Re: [patch] make headers wrap at wrapmargin rather than hardcoded
=- Thomas Roessler wrote on Mon 8.Jan'07 at 12:19:59 +0100 -=
> Here's a variant that should do the right things both when sending
> and displaying messages. I'd be happy for a second pair of eyes on
> this one, since wraplen is no longer a fixed small integer.
Looks good, only misses the "too big" range check for negative
WrapMargin (the same for pager.c), or is this too pathological not
to worry about?
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
Even if it seems insignificant, in fact EVERY effort counts
for a shared task, at least to show your deserving attitude.