Re: [PATCH] Fix <buffy-list>
On Friday, 17 November 2006 at 19:23, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the <buffy-list> function is "broken" because it too small fixed-sized
> buffer for its output, 160 currently. However, my terminal is 181
> columns wide and always wondered if it's my patched mutt that causes the
> info to be truncated. Turns out it's not. :-)
>
> The attached patch uses 2*STRING (512 byte) and I hope that it's enough
> for some to come. As an alternative, we could also get memory
> dynamically via curses' COLS...
Applied, thanks.