<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: multipart/signed



On 2006-08-16 23:32:20 +0100, Paul Walker wrote:

> I've just got a mail from another list with the headers below;
> this triggered a message from mutt that the mail had no protocol.
> Is a protocol a required part of these headers? If so, someone
> should probably tell the SquirrelMail author(s)...

It is, at least for the versions of multipart/signed that mutt
supports (S/MIME and OpenPGP/MIME).

Cheers,
-- 
Thomas Roessler   <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>