Re: imap/2366: Does not support username with @
The following reply was made to PR imap/2366; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Brendan Cully <brendan@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: bug-any@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: imap/2366: Does not support username with @
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 08:43:51 -0700
On Wednesday, 09 August 2006 at 08:12, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 11:58:18PM +0200, Brendan Cully wrote:
> > Synopsis: Does not support username with @
> >
> > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> > State-Changed-By: brendan
> > State-Changed-When: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 23:58:18 +0200
> > State-Changed-Why:
> > Not a bug.
>
>
> What does that mean: "not a bug"?
>
> Usernames with a @ are more and more common...
It means mutt handles usernames with @ just fine. If there is a bug,
that's not it. I asked for more information but never got it, so I
assumed this was a hit and run report.