<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: imap/2366: Does not support username with @



* On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 Hadmut Danisch (hadmut@xxxxxxxxxx) muttered:
> The following reply was made to PR imap/2366; it has been noted by GNATS.
> 
> From: hadmut@xxxxxxxxxx (Hadmut Danisch)
> To: bug-any@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: brendan@xxxxxxxxxx, mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: imap/2366: Does not support username with @
> Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 08:12:27 +0200
> 
>  On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 11:58:18PM +0200, Brendan Cully wrote:
>  > Synopsis: Does not support username with @
>  > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
>  > Not a bug.
>  
>  
>  What does that mean: "not a bug"? 
>  
>  Usernames with a @ are more and more common...

It's not a bug because mutt handles usernames like user@foo just fine
and since you didn't follow up with a debugtrace brendan closed the PR.

Michael
-- 
"Problem solving under linux has never been the circus that it is under
AIX."
(By Pete Ehlke in comp.unix.aix)

PGP-Key-ID: 0xDC1A44DD
Jabber:     init[0]@amessage.de